1973) 14, 17 Missouri v. Reproductive Health Services, [cite] 29 However, a brief summary of the pertinent facts is necessary to Pet. Quimbee is a one-of-a-kind educational resource for law students and legal professionals. Background . Counsel: Summary of Facts: The appellant, at age 3, had suffered serious injuries when a jug of boiling water fell across his body. However, a brief summary of the pertinent facts is necessary to Street Law Case Summary 07/22/2020 . About two months before he died, he executed a general power of attorney, designating defendant as The defendant beat his child, causing a skull fracture and brain injury. STATEMENT OF THE CASE 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS 7 ARGUMENT 10 POINT I. Epilepsy. R v Byrne (1960) Paranoia. Rosdon filed a products liability suit against R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. after having his leg amputated due to severe peripheral atherosclerotic vascular disease. R v Campbell (1997) Depression. 566, 557 S.E.2d 126 (2001), revd per curiam, 356 N.C. 287, 569 S.E.2d 645 (2002). The Court noted that the privilege was absolute, even if the need in the plaintiff was compelling. R v Reynolds's bio. Both Steven Hicks and Timothy Reynolds registered blood alcohol levels of .17 percent. R v Martin (Tony) 2001. 588, seeking the return of twelve of the animals seized by the Commission. 486 US 456 (1988) Argued. Argued November 13, 1963.Decided June 15, 1964. R v Taktak (1988): (Negligent omission) Facts: The Defendant [Taktak] picked up some prostitutes with his heroin supplier. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 17 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Cecilia Reynolds, State of South Carolina; that the Petition was not timely filed and is therefore barred by 2244(d). v. SIMS ET AL. R v Shepherd R v Shepherd (1988) 86 Cr App R 47 Court of Appeal The appellant was a member of a gang of shoplifters. 161, 164 (1896); Guin v. City of Riviera Beach, 388 So.2d 604, 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). 75, provides a "two-track" system for undertaking "adverse actions" against certain Government employees. MLB headnote and full text. R v Reynolds 1988. Wood Sawmill, Inc., 426 N.W.2d 13, 14 (S.D. He was put in hospital for a lengthy period. Citation377 U.S. 533, 84 S. Ct. 1362, 12 L. Ed. Supreme Court of United States. We affirm. Grigsby v. Reynolds Metals Co. Appellant Mary B. Grigsby brings this appeal from the district court's entry of summary judgment in favor of her employer, Reynolds Metals Company, on her disparate treatment claims under Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). 27 and 41. 2d 285 Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. 23 and for appellees in Nos. David P. Reynolds (Defendant) appeals an order filed 30 August1999 (the 30 August 1999 Order) in favor of Cynthia Flynn (Plaintiff) adjudicating Defendant in criminal contempt andordering him to pay Plaintiffs attorneys fees in the sum of$65,000.00. 2d 339 (Fla. Dist. The trial judge convicted the accused and fined him $500.00. Decided: January 13, 1988. This page contains a form to search the Supreme Court of Canada case information database. GREENE, Judge. An application for leave to appeal from the conviction of 20 th March 1997, Criminal Form B1, was filed by the appellant in the Court of Appeal Registry on 8 th April 1997. 2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) ..32,33 Reynolds v. State, 784 So. Judge: Tompkins J. 1. 1988) Important Paras Even if this Court were to find that Congress authorized the Court's to develop a body of federal common law regarding the rights of those who violated another's civil rights, the Court still finds that a defendant may not have a claim for contribution or indemnification. Apr 19, 1988. If he was aware that the act was wrong in law then he could be considered aware that he ought not to do it. Summary R v Reynolds was born on July 10, 1935. The appeal was accordingly dismissed. Nova Scotia Supreme Court. Summary of R. v. Reynolds R. v. Reynolds, 1998 NSCA 230 (CanLII) by Nova Scotia Barristers' Society. [*] APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Vintage Camel Cigarettes 75th Birthday Joe Camel Auto Shade 1988 RJ Reynolds at the best online prices at eBay! This appeal interface regards freedom of expression, protection of reputation and qualified privilege.5. granted, 343 U.S. 918 (1952). 1951); cert. STATEMENT OF THE CASE 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS 7 ARGUMENT 10 POINT I. [1] Florida Power Corp. v. McNeely, 125 So. Brief. He tried to leave but was threatened with violence against himself and family if he did not continue. Decided. Plaintiff and Defendant were married on 2 July 1983. Reynolds Case: Mr.Reynolds Vs Times Newspaper. The evidence was framed by the State's theory that Petitioner, fearing he was losing Velva, in a cold and calculating fashion, attempted to remove the individual responsible for his loss only to confront an innocent witness he had not expected to be present. 566, 557 S.E.2d 126 (2001), revd per curiam, 356 N.C. 287, 569 S.E.2d 645 (2002). Free shipping for many products! In this case we hold that federal law does not preempt a cause of action alleging that specified cigarette advertising is an unfair business practice under California law. The claimant, Reynolds, appeals, contending that the district court erred in ordering forfeiture of the entire second tract . Jenkins v. State, 385 So. William Walker Reynolds, Jr. (decedent) died in 1997, leaving four children to squabble over the division of his property and the distribution of his estate. 4. A detailedsummary of the facts giving rise to this appeal is set forth in our first opinion, Reynolds v. Reynolds, 147 N.C. App. Supreme Court of United States. WRIGHT v. REYNOLDS, (N.D.Tex. Accordingly, the court recommends that the respondents motion for summary judgment be granted. 377 U.S. 533 (1964) REYNOLDS, JUDGE, ET AL. Plaintiff Timmy Reynolds, his wife JoDee, and children Matthew, Andrew, and Weslee originally sued Steven Hicks, his sister Dianne, and Does I through V [1] in October, 1990. R v Holley 2005 D and V were a couple of chronic alcoholics, V told D that she had sex with another man, D went and fetched his axe and intended to go and chop some wood to cool down, as he was about to leave she commented 'you haven't got the guts!', Born 1935 and died 1992. New Zealand Trade Practices Appeal Authority 1959-1965. He was charged with burglary and the trial judge withdrew the defence of duress from the jury and he was convicted. 4. This case came before the House of Lords as an appeal. 3. Summary: The accused was charged with having care and control of a vessel while having an excessive blood-alcohol content, contrary to s. 237 (b) of the Criminal Code. R died on March 15, 59 A.P.R. 1995) and Firestone Steel Prods. Brief of Respondent,Reynolds v. Reynolds, No. The First Amendment protects the right to free speech and free press. 1988) denying motion for summary judgment on civil conspiracy claim filed against tobacco trade association; Rogers was later criticized twice by the Texas Supreme Court, see Triplex Communications v Riley, 900 S.W.2d 716, 720 n. 2 (Tex. Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145, was a Supreme Court of the United States case that held that religious duty was not a defense to a criminal indictment. R. v Squelch (David), [2017] EWCA Crim 204, 1753 WL 86. 1 They had a rather close relationship as demonstrated by the Mr Squelch driving the deceased to and from work on a daily basis. Martin London, a member of the New York bar, argued the cause for appellant (Norris, McLaughlin & Marcus, attorneys; M. Karen Thompson, on the brief). Timothy Reynolds suffered serious injuries as a result of the accident. - THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT' S DECISION IN Jane Smith, 108 S. Ct 2136 (1988) 16 Jones v. Smith, 278 So. At her trial the defences of self defence and provocation were rejected by the jury and she was convicted of murder. Reynolds. 23 and for appellees in Nos. Facts of the case In 1983, Robert Fulmer and Louis Molitoris who have IQs of 67 and 60, respectively were discovered working on the Kozminski dairy farm in Chelsea, Michigan. Visit for cases and legislation Search; Sign Up; Log In Mar 18, 2014. The pathologist was of the view that 14 blows were struck. 377 U.S. 533 (1964) REYNOLDS, JUDGE, ET AL. People Photos Purpose. R v Seers (1984) R v Gittens (1984) Premenstrual tension. Decided. Nov 22, 1988. Court: Date: 1997. Michael P. Ambrosio argued the cause for respondent, Claire E. Dewey, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Wilfred E. Dewey, Deceased (Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, Cases [References are to paragraph numbers] [Current to Update 69] R v Court [1988] 2 WLR 1071 R v Crisologo (1997) 99 A Crim R 178 R v Croft [1981] 1 NSWLR 126 R v Crozier (unrep, 8/3/96, NSWCCA Reynolds v R [2015] NSWCCA 29 AnyLaw is the FREE and Friendly legal research service that gives you unlimited access to massive amounts of valuable legal data. Ct. App. Summary. tit. As a result, Bogoshi sued National Media, the owner of City Press for defamation. The supplier and the prostitutes went to a party, and later the Defendant picked one of the prostitutes up from the party, because she was extremely sick. 536 *536 W. McLean Pitts argued the cause for appellants in No. the house, driveway and swimming pool, was used to facilitate the distribution of cocaine. Infringement of Treaty Right Leads to Stay of Proceedings: R. v. Reynolds, 2017 NBCA 36, New Brunswick Court of Appeal (Richard, Green and French JJ.A. Apr 19, 1988. Two of the groups are cross-appellants in Nos. A three-judge District Court was convened, and three groups of voters, taxpayers and residents of Jefferson, Mobile, and Etowah Counties were permitted to intervene. Reynolds v. Sims. No. Timothy Reynolds suffered serious injuries as a result of the accident. An employee removed for "cause," 7511-7514, has a right of appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board (Board), 7513 (d), that includes a hearing. 3. A. REYNOLDS, etc., et al., Appellants, v. M. O. SIMS et al. 2d 244 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983) 16 Linehan v. State, 476 So. Jun 6, 1988. In Reynolds, a husband and wife had sold some property with a very low tax basis, therefore resulting in a large taxable gain. 1988). M was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 14 years and 5 months. In 1995, the district court granted defendants' joint motion for summary judgment in part, and dismissed Burton's fraudulent misrepresentation and breach of express warranty claims. Title: Murray v Ministry of Defence - 1988Example case summary. 00427) Indexed As: R. v. Ernst. Held: Reynolds Filing 74 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that Petitioner's 46 MOTION for Evidentiary Hearing filed by Robert Dale Smart, be DENIED; Respondent's 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Cecilia Reynolds be GRANTED; and the habeas petition be DISMISSED with prejudice. As a threshold matter, we note that summary judgment is likely to be inappropriate in cases where the issues involve intent. By failing to reapportion seats for its legislature for 60 years, Alabamas voting scheme permitted a minority of the people in the State to 27 and 41. 2 On the 31st of December [*] APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. May 26, 1988. 536 *536 W. McLean Pitts argued the cause for appellants in No. Reynolds. 13-14590 C-1 of 10 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to 11TH Circuit R. 26.1-1, the undersigned certifies that amicus curiae Public Justice, P.C. Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988) Argued: October 13, 1987 . Ct. App. Research the case of Michelle Reynolds v. Ryan Addis, from the Sixth Circuit, 04-11-2022. does not have a parent company or issue stock, and that no publicly-held company has an ownership interest (such as In this setting a plea bargain was struck. Attorney(s) appearing for the Case. We find that the district court properly applied Louisiana's Products Liability Act to Brown's claim and affirm the summary judgment. Brief Fact Summary. Page 676. based upon evidence that only a relatively small portion of the tract, i.e. STATEMENT. In May 1983, Robert E. Reynolds, the school principal, received the pages proofs for the May 13 issue. A detailedsummary of the facts giving rise to this appeal is set forth in our first opinion, Reynolds v. Reynolds, 147 N.C. App. Burton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 884 F. Supp. D and Reynolds v. Sims. Winselmann's appropriate remedy at law for an injury to or disturbance of his alleged easement would have to be an action for trespass on the case or simply "on the case." Opinion for Schubert v. Reynolds, 95 Cal. The courts have struggled with this situation. Text of United States v. Reynolds, 345 U.S. 1 (1953) is available from: Justia Library of Congress Herring v USA - Decision finding there was no fraud in the Government's 1953 claim of privilege. 588, seeking the return of twelve of the animals seized by the Commission. The accused appealed. Hart, MacDonald, and Pace, JJ.A. Reynolds found two of the articles in the issue to be inappropriate, and ordered that the pages on which the articles appeared be withheld from publication. 27 and 41. Argued November 13, 1963.Decided June 15, 1964. Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed a summary judgment in a civil action. GREENE, Judge. Fantasising not proof of insanity : Fantasising not a foundation for psychiatric evidence in murder : Evidence of fantasising does not lay a foundation for psychiatric evidence in a murder trial. Facts of the case. - THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT' S DECISION IN Jane Smith, 108 S. Ct 2136 (1988) 16 Jones v. Smith, 278 So. Mr. Reynolds proceedings came before Franch J and jury and main issues were about the Articles Qualified privilege10 at common law, justification, malice and damages. In this case Times took a defence as this a matter of public interest, fair and accurate report. Since 1988, Reynolds has used a cartoon character called Old Joe Camel in its advertising campaign in order to attract teenage smokers. SHARE. Mar 18, 2014. 849 F.2d 230 (1988) Facts Floyd Roysdon (plaintiff) began regularly smoking cigarettes manufactured by R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (Reynolds) (defendant) in 1946. Brown v. Solary, 37 Fla. 102, 112, 19 So. CA (Crim Div) 18/10/1988. Summary of this case from E.E.O.C. United States v. Reynolds, 235 U.S. 133 (1914) .. 20 Constitution, statutes and rules: quirements of Section 1988 and this Courts cases con-struing that statute. 701.12 (2). -Includes spitting: R v Cotesworth (1704); use of weapon or missile, taking something from hand of another: Fisher v Carousel Motor Hotel Inc (1967), throwing water: Pursell v Horn (1838), shining light in eyes of another: Kaye v Robertson (1991) - P does not have to be aware of contact at time it is made: Chatterton v Gerson (1981) where P under Signed by Magistrate Judge Paige J Gossett on 1/15/2010. Citation849 F.2d 230 (6th Cir. See Canderm Pharmacal, Ltd. v. Elder Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 862 F.2d 597, 601 (6th Cir.1988). To obtain a recovery for a trespass to real property then, it is clear that the aggrieved party must have had an ownership or possessory interest in the property at the time of the trespass. Graham v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Case No. Institute of Policy Studies, Victoria University of Wellington - Studies in Taxation Policy 1985-1990. 3 TABLE OF CITATIONS CASES CASE PAGES Brown v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, 611 F.3d 1324 (11th Cir. On November 25, 2003, Reynolds filed the instant motion pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 486 US 456 (1988) Argued. Reynolds resigned because her infant daughter suffered from an illness that required her to be breast-fed, and Reynolds was unable to obtain a transfer to a position within DPS that would have accommodated this need. FACTS At the time of the offence, both the appellant (David Squelch) and the deceased (James Wallington) were employed at a recycling centre in Tunbridge Wells. Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia - Division 2 Family Law 2021-. At trial, the State built its case on the testimony of investigating police, forensic experts, and Doug and Velva Ivens. Cathy Kuhlmeier and two other former Hazelwood East students brought the case to court. David J. VANN and Robert S. Vance, Appellants, v. Agnes BAGGETT, Secretary of State of Alabama et al. 4. Facts of the case. New Zealand Trade Practices and Prices Commission 1959-1967. 0 I Concur. Rptr. From law school case briefs to law school outlines, from bar exam prep to MCLE, Quimbee provides you with the tools you need to succeed in the classroom and beyond. Ch. Citation377 U.S. 533, 84 S. Ct. 1362, 12 L. Ed. Plaintiff and Defendant were married on 2 July 1983. A three-judge District Court was convened, and three groups of voters, taxpayers and residents of Jefferson, Mobile, and Etowah Counties were permitted to intervene. A jury convicted William Osborne Reynolds of possessing a sharp instrument while lawfully confined in a state prison, in violation of Penal Code section 4502. fn. R v Tandy [1989] 1 WLR 350 Case summary last updated at 11/01/2020 15:41 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team. App. He suffered extensive scarring, and endured embarrassment and teasing during his school years. M now submitted that he had been unfit to plead: the appeal on that ground was dismissed. 1988) Brief Fact Summary. This is a slightly more troublesome area of the law. v. SIMS ET AL. Brief of Respondent,Reynolds v. Reynolds, No. Mr. Brecheen was convicted by a jury of first degree murder and first degree burglary. Petitioner Karen Howsam was a customer of respondent Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., a securities broker-dealer, from the spring of 1986, when she purchased interests in four limited partnerships, until late 1994, when she closed her accounts. Reynolds would plead guilty to one armed robbery and to a separate charge of grand larceny. On 18th June, 1982, the appellant was convicted of the murder of his wife. This is the second time this case is before us. R. v. John William Reynolds (S.C.C. No. 2d 1262 (Fla. 1985) .16,17 Ogletree v. State, 525 So. App. This case explores the legal concepts of freedom of speech and freedom of press. 761 S.W.2d 788 (Tex. 2d 339 (Fla. Dist. His sentence would be thirty-five years. Memorialize R's life with photos and stories about them and the Reynolds family history and genealogy. R V REYNOLDS (1988) PUBLISHED October 18, 1988. The ferocity of the attack was such that it is likely that she would have been rendered unconscious after three to five blows. This case turns on whether its merit is to be measured by the Louisiana Products Liability Act effective September 1, 1988, or Louisiana tort law in place before that date. Hazelwood East High School Principal Robert Reynolds reviewed Spectrum, the schools student-written newspaper, before publication. Page 377 U. S. 542. in the action as intervenor-plaintiffs. D was a 19yr old woman who battered her mother to death with a hammer, at the trial for murder, D shown she was suffering from post-natal depression after giving birth without telling the family, the court agreed and D was sentenced with manslaughter by reason of diminished responsibility. Both Steven Hicks and Timothy Reynolds registered blood alcohol levels of .17 percent. 0 I Concur. 284 words B. Case history; Prior: Judgments entered in favor of the plaintiffs upheld, Reynolds v.United States, 192 F.2d 987 (3d Cir. 56(c). Judgement for the case R v Tandy A woman who was an alcoholic drank a huge amount then strangled her 11 year old daughter. R. v. Ernst (S.C.A. The purpose of this study was to describe RJ Reynolds (RJR) Tobacco Company's strategy for targeting African Americans, as revealed in tobacco industry documents and magazine advertisements. Brief. v. Exxon Corp. 1515, 1527-28 (D. Kan. 1995). 318. In Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988), the Supreme Court held that schools may restrict what is published in student newspapers if the papers have not been established as public forums.The Court also decided that the schools may limit the First Amendment rights of students if the student speech is inconsistent with the schools basic 27 and 41. 1 The jury imposed the death penalty after it found the existence of one aggravating circumstance, namely, that Mr. Brecheen knowingly created a great risk of death to more than one person. The Registrar, by notice dated 22 nd April 1997 to the Registrar of the Supreme Court, advised the latter of the application and requested copies of the proceedings and the summing-up of the learned trial Fed.R.Civ.P. Reynolds fails to identify a Barnwell explained to Reynolds his rights regarding the plea and, as well, his exposure to multiple, lengthy sentences if convicted of all of the robberies. This is the second time this case is before us. This case was about the Prime minister of Ireland, where Mr. Reynolds annouced his resignation in the Dail6 on 17th Nov 94 due to political crisis. The City Press newspaper had published a series of articles alleging misconduct on the part of Nthedi Bogoshi, an attorney in South Africa. View full document. [1] Florida Power Corp. v. McNeely, 125 So. On November 17, 2003, following a summary trial before a district justice, Reynolds was acquitted of all of the charges. The case Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. King, 126 F.3d 25, 44 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1051 (2nd Cir. 1973) 14, 17 Missouri v. Reproductive Health Services, [cite] 29 Winselmann's appropriate remedy at law for an injury to or disturbance of his alleged easement would have to be an action for trespass on the case or simply "on the case." On November 25, 2003, Reynolds filed the instant motion pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. Approximately 38 years later, Roysdons leg was partially amputated due to severe peripheral atherosclerotic vascular disease. I. A plaintiff can maintain a products liability suit if the product is defective or unreasonably dangerous. 2d 1356 (Fla. 1980) ..8 Linehan v. State, 442 So. Page 377 U. S. 542. in the action as intervenor-plaintiffs. 1997), (also know as the "Blue Note Case") the operator of a New York Jazz club called "The Blue Note" brought an action for trademark violation against a Missouri club of the same name. 2. 484 U.S. 518. On the available evidence, the Court held that whilst it was clear that C was abnormal mentally there was sufficient evidence that he was conscious that the act was wrong and contrary to law. : Holding; In this case, there was a valid claim of privilege under Rule 34; and a judgment based under Rule 37 on refusal to produce the documents subjected the United States to liability to which Congress did not consent by 21, Sec. Synopsis of Rule of Law. 2d 506, 1964 U.S. 1002. Reynolds was the first Supreme Court opinion to address the First Amendment's protection of religious liberties, impartial juries and the Confrontation Clauses of the Sixth Amendment. Syllabus. The ruling overturned the plaintiffs conviction by the Minnesota Supreme Court for burning a cross on the lawn of an African American family. Title 5 U.S.C. 23. These injuries would have, in the normal course of things, eventually killed the child. See Okla.Stat. 1 FE Reynolds's sole contention on appeal is that the trial court committed prejudicial error by failing to instruct the jury, sua sponte, that he could only be convicted if the jury found that he knowingly possessed After serving his sentence for assaulting the child, he beat the child again. 4th 100, 115 Cal. 2d 967 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988) ..24 Ortega v. State, 438 So. Vincent v. It follows that the majority of the blows were struck when Miss De Souza was helpless and unconscious. R v English (1981) (unreported) Post natal depression. R v Reynolds (1988) Battered Woman Syndrome. September 17, 1979. its contin-uing intransigence in the face of this Courts ruling in Obergefell, which has already merited one summary re-versal from this Court. 23. Reynolds v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. Case Digest Summary. The appellant did as he had planned. It found that Reynolds had failed to meet the requirement that he, as challenger of a juror's objectivity, demonstrate that a juror had developed a real and strong opinion. The prosecution had discharged two potential jurors who refused to say whether or not they were living in polygamy. Two of the groups are cross-appellants in Nos. Plaintiff Timmy Reynolds, his wife JoDee, and children Matthew, Andrew, and Weslee originally sued Steven Hicks, his sister Dianne, and Does I through V [1] in October, 1990. Summary of this case from Committee of Russian Federation on Precious Metals and Gems v. Appeal Division. He appeals against that conviction on the ground that the judge misdirected the jury on the issue of diminished responsibility. 2. David P. Reynolds (Defendant) appeals an order filed 30 August1999 (the 30 August 1999 Order) in favor of Cynthia Flynn (Plaintiff) adjudicating Defendant in criminal contempt andordering him to pay Plaintiffs attorneys fees in the sum of$65,000.00. Robert Reynolds, the opportunity to review the paper before publication. Case Summary and Outcome The U.S. Supreme Court held that an ordinance prohibiting fighting words that were racially motivated was unconstitutional under the First Amendment. Jun 6, 1988. Brief Fact Summary. The appellant was charged with one count of common assault. The Supreme Court in Reynolds held that such information should be protected from disclosure when there is a "danger that compulsion of the evidence will expose military matters which, in the interest of national security, should not be divulged." 2d 506, 1964 U.S. 1002. By failing to reapportion seats for its legislature for 60 years, Alabamas voting scheme permitted a minority of the people in the State to George Reynolds was a member of You can search by the SCC 5-digit case number, by name or word in the style of cause, or by file number from the appeal court. [FN8] On December 3, 2003, a hearing was conducted before the trial court on Reynolds' motion. Reynolds began working for DPS in 1981 and was a patrol officer from 1982 until January 7, 1986, when she resigned her position. Pre-menstrual tension ( R v Smith 1982, R v Reynolds 1988) Epilepsy ( R v Campbell 1997) Chronic depression ( R v Seers, R v Gittens 1984) In each case the defendant must demonstrate that the characteristic was excessive when compared to Decided February 23, 1988.